This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ patch] for C++/52369

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Fabien Chêne <fabien dot chene at gmail dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:50:05 -0500
Subject: Re: [C++ patch] for C++/52369
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CAFH4-diup6eH5j3MhZcknAAia+6ZSyzwD5D94WV0NMa+otgjFg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFH4-dgpyn56MQN-7bXM9teA9tBWSFYbcsjiAG5TT53YU04XjA at mail dot gmail dot com> <530F8315 dot 5010703 at redhat dot com> <CAFH4-dgj=JNDHuy2gaW0G9VcdwgrLMiGQg1JHuJHdB-Fcb2SQQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <5310FF29 dot 6060102 at redhat dot com> <CAFH4-diMgdJBTGV=fRZaESLhR4aGR_i8zyL1j99-sKD5eJRFQg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFH4-dhTjeyq-pdi49rdFMcmTdb3qQY4feZYH5tM61C5ixQT3Q at mail dot gmail dot com>

On 02/28/2014 05:04 PM, Fabien Chêne wrote:

I guess my mistake comes from the fact that %q#D is not present in the
c++98 diagnostic. Shall we homogeneise that as well ?
In favor of %q#D ?


OK.

Jason

References:
- [C++ patch] for C++/52369
  - From: Fabien Chêne
- Re: [C++ patch] for C++/52369
  - From: Fabien Chêne
- Re: [C++ patch] for C++/52369
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ patch] for C++/52369
  - From: Fabien Chêne
- Re: [C++ patch] for C++/52369
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ patch] for C++/52369
  - From: Fabien Chêne
- Re: [C++ patch] for C++/52369
  - From: Fabien Chêne

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]