This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix ix86_function_regparm with optimize attribute (PR target/60062)


On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> Using !!optimize to determine if we should switch local ABI to regparm
> convention isn't compatible with optimize attribute, as !!optimize is
> whether the current function is being optimized, but for the ABI decisions
> we actually need the caller and callee to agree on the calling convention.
> 
> Fixed by looking at callee's optimize settings all the time.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

Seeing a 2nd variant of such code I'd rather have an abstraction
for this ... optimize_fn ()?  opt_for_fn (fn, OPT_...)?

Richard.

> 2014-02-05  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
> 
> 	PR target/60062
> 	* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_regparm): Use optimize
> 	from the callee instead of current function's optimize
> 	to determine if local regparm convention should be used.
> 
> 	* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr60062.c: New test.
> 	* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr60072.c: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/config/i386/i386.c.jj	2014-02-04 01:36:00.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c	2014-02-05 09:09:29.603827877 +0100
> @@ -5608,11 +5608,22 @@ ix86_function_regparm (const_tree type,
>    /* Use register calling convention for local functions when possible.  */
>    if (decl
>        && TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL
> -      && optimize
>        && !(profile_flag && !flag_fentry))
>      {
>        /* FIXME: remove this CONST_CAST when cgraph.[ch] is constified.  */
>        struct cgraph_local_info *i = cgraph_local_info (CONST_CAST_TREE (decl));
> +
> +      /* Caller and callee must agree on the calling convention, so
> +	 checking here just optimize means that with
> +	 __attribute__((optimize (...))) caller could use regparm convention
> +	 and callee not, or vice versa.  Instead look at whether the callee
> +	 is optimized or not.  */
> +      tree opts = DECL_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_OPTIMIZATION (decl);
> +      if (opts == NULL_TREE)
> +	opts = optimization_default_node;
> +      if (!TREE_OPTIMIZATION (opts)->x_optimize)
> +	i = NULL;
> +
>        if (i && i->local && i->can_change_signature)
>  	{
>  	  int local_regparm, globals = 0, regno;
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr60062.c.jj	2014-02-05 09:02:13.703085235 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr60062.c	2014-02-05 09:01:54.000000000 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +/* PR target/60062 */
> +
> +int a;
> +
> +static void
> +foo (const char *p1, int p2)
> +{
> +  if (__builtin_strcmp (p1, "hello") != 0)
> +    __builtin_abort ();
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +bar (const char *p1)
> +{
> +  if (__builtin_strcmp (p1, "hello") != 0)
> +    __builtin_abort ();
> +}
> +
> +__attribute__((optimize (0))) int
> +main ()
> +{
> +  foo ("hello", a);
> +  bar ("hello");
> +  return 0;
> +}
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr60072.c.jj	2013-08-25 18:20:55.717911035 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr60072.c	2014-02-05 11:33:07.501748426 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +/* PR target/60072 */
> +
> +int c = 1;
> +
> +__attribute__ ((optimize (1)))
> +static int *foo (int *p)
> +{
> +  return p;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> +  *foo (&c) = 2;
> +  return c - 2;
> +}
> 
> 	Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE / SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend"orffer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]