This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 01/07/2014 08:36 PM, Tim Shen wrote:
Not sure I'm following all the past and present tenses ;) but in my old message I proposed to commit now the *correctness* fixes too, which, I suppose, are fixes which don't have compile-time performance implications.On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:Ideally, I would suggest committing first the improvements in your previous patch (by the way, thanks for the numbers!) + the pure bug fixes and separate the further performance improvements which have compile-time performance implications (how big?), see if, eg, Jon has something to recommend. Can we do that?First patch committed. I later found that the second patch "b.diff" is based on the committed version (the attach, which fixed the "&&" problem);
Paolo.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |