This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] libgcov.c re-factoring and offline profile-tool


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> wrote:
> Ok -- gcov_write_counter and gcov_write_tag_length are qualified as
> low level primitives for basic gcov format and probably should be kept
> in gcov-io.c.
>
> gcov_rewrite is petty much libgcov runtime implementation details so I
> think it should be moved out. gcov_write_summary is not related to
> gcov low level format either, neither is gcov_seek.  Ok for them to be
> moved?

After looking at these some more, with the idea that gcov-io.c should
encapsulate the lower level IO routines, then I think all of these
(including gcov_rewrite) should remain in gcov-io.c. I think
gcov_write_summary belongs there since all of the other gcov_write_*
are there. And gcov_seek and gcov_rewrite are both adjusting gcov_var
fields to affect the file IO operations. And there are currently no
references to gcov_var within libgcc/libgcov* files.

So I think we should leave the patch as-is. Honza, is the current
patch ok for trunk?

Thanks,
Teresa

>
> thanks,
>
> David
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
>>> I think so -- they are private to libgcov.  Honza, what do you think?
>>
>> Hmm, the purpose of gcov-io was to be low level IO library for the basic
>> gcov file format.  I am not sure if gcov_write_tag_length should really resist
>> in other file than gcov_write_tag.
>>
>> I see a desire to isolate actual stdio calls so one can have replacement driver
>> for i.e. Linux kernel. For that reason things like gcov_seek and friends probably
>> should be separated, but what is reason for splitting the file handling itself?
>>
>> Honza
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson@google.com> wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> wrote:
>>> >> gcov_rewrite function is only needed (and defined) with IN_LIBGCOV.
>>> >> Should it be moved from common file gcov-io.c to libgcov.c?
>>> >
>>> > Possibly. I just looked through gcov-io.c and there are several
>>> > additional functions that are only defined under "#ifdef IN_LIBGCOV"
>>> > and only used in libgcov*c (or each other):
>>> >
>>> > gcov_write_counter
>>> > gcov_write_tag_length
>>> > gcov_write_summary
>>> > gcov_seek
>>> >
>>> > Should they all, plus gcov_rewrite, be moved to libgcov-driver.c?
>>> >
>>> > Teresa
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> David
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson@google.com> wrote:
>>> >>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson@google.com> wrote:
>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
>>> >>>>>> Hi, all
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> This is the new patch for gcov-tool (previously profile-tool).
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Honza: can you comment on the new merge interface? David posted some
>>> >>>>>> comments in an earlier email and we want to know what's your opinion.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Test patch has been tested with boostrap, regresssion,
>>> >>>>>> profiledbootstrap and SPEC2006.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Noticeable changes from the earlier version:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 1. create a new file libgcov.h and move libgcov-*.h headers to libgcov.h
>>> >>>>>> So we can included multiple libgcov-*.c without adding new macros.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 2. split libgcov.h specific code in gcvo-io.h to libcc/libgcov.h
>>> >>>>>> Avoid multiple-page of code under IN_LIBGCOV macro -- this
>>> >>>>>> improves the readability.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 3. make gcov_var static, and move the definition from gcov-io.h to
>>> >>>>>> gcov-io.c. Also
>>> >>>>>>    move some static functions accessing gcov_var to gcvo-io.c
>>> >>>>>> Current code rely on GCOV_LINKAGE tricks to avoid multi-definition. I don't see
>>> >>>>>> a reason that gcov_var needs to exposed as a global.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 4. expose gcov_write_strings() and gcov_sync() to gcov_tool usage
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 5. rename profile-tool to gcov-tool per Honza's suggestion.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Thanks,
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Hi,
>>> >>>>> I did not read in deatil the gcov-tool source itself, but lets first make the interface changes
>>> >>>>> needed.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 2013-11-18  Rong Xu  <xur@google.com>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>       * gcc/gcov-io.c (gcov_var): Moved from gcov-io.h and make it static.
>>> >>>>>>       (gcov_position): Move from gcov-io.h
>>> >>>>>>       (gcov_is_error): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (gcov_rewrite): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       * gcc/gcov-io.h: Re-factoring. Move gcov_var to gcov-io.h and
>>> >>>>>>         move the libgcov only part of libgcc/libgcov.h.
>>> >>>>>>       * libgcc/libgcov.h: New common header files for libgcov-*.h
>>> >>>>>>       * libgcc/Makefile.in: Add dependence to libgcov.h
>>> >>>>>>       * libgcc/libgcov-profiler.c: Use libgcov.h
>>> >>>>>>       * libgcc/libgcov-driver.c: Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       * libgcc/libgcov-interface.c: Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       * libgcc/libgcov-driver-system.c (allocate_filename_struct): use
>>> >>>>>>       xmalloc instread of malloc.
>>> >>>>>>       * libgcc/libgcov-merge.c (void __gcov_merge_delta): Add more
>>> >>>>>>       parameters to merge function.
>>> >>>>>>       (__gcov_merge_add): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (__gcov_merge_ior): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (__gcov_merge_time_profile): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (__gcov_merge_single): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (__gcov_merge_delta): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       * libgcc/libgcov-tool.c (void gcov_tool_set_verbose): New for
>>> >>>>>>       gcov-tool support.
>>> >>>>>>       (set_fn_ctrs): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (tag_function): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (tag_blocks): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (tag_arcs): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (tag_lines): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (tag_counters): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (tag_summary): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (read_gcda_finalize): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (read_gcda_file): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (ftw_read_file): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (read_profile_dir_init) Ditto.:
>>> >>>>>>       (gcov_read_profile_dir): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (gcov_merge): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (find_match_gcov_inf Ditto.o):
>>> >>>>>>       (gcov_profile_merge): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (__gcov_scale_add): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (__gcov_scale_ior): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (__gcov_scale_delta): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (__gcov_scale_single): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (gcov_profile_scale): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (gcov_profile_normalize): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (__gcov_scale2_add): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (__gcov_scale2_ior): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (__gcov_scale2_delta): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (__gcov_scale2_single): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (gcov_profile_scale2): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       * gcc/gcov-tool.c (unlink_file): Gcov-tool driver support.
>>> >>>>>>       (unlink_dir): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (profile_merge): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (print_merge_usage_message): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (merge_usage): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (do_merge): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (profile_rewrite2): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (profile_rewrite): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (print_rewrite_usage_message): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (rewrite_usage): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (do_rewrite): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (print_usage): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (print_version): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (process_args): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       (main): Ditto.
>>> >>>>>>       * gcc/Makefile.in: Build and install gcov-tool.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Index: gcc/gcov-io.c
>>> >>>>>> ===================================================================
>>> >>>>>> --- gcc/gcov-io.c     (revision 204895)
>>> >>>>>> +++ gcc/gcov-io.c     (working copy)
>>> >>>>>> @@ -36,6 +36,37 @@ static const gcov_unsigned_t *gcov_read_words (uns
>>> >>>>>>  static void gcov_allocate (unsigned);
>>> >>>>>>  #endif
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> +/* Moved for gcov-io.h and make it static.  */
>>> >>>>>> +static struct gcov_var gcov_var;
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> This is more an changelog message than a comment in source file.
>>> >>>>> Just describe what gcov_var is.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I changed this so gcov_var is no longer static, but global as before.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Do you know how the size of libgcov changed with your patch?
>>> >>>>> Quick check of current mainline on compiling empty main gives:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> jh@gcc10:~/trunk/build/gcc$ cat t.c
>>> >>>>> main()
>>> >>>>> {
>>> >>>>> }
>>> >>>>> jh@gcc10:~/trunk/build/gcc$ ./xgcc -B ./ -O2 -fprofile-generate -o a.out-new --static t.c
>>> >>>>> jh@gcc10:~/trunk/build/gcc$ gcc -O2 -fprofile-generate -o a.out-old --static t.c
>>> >>>>> jh@gcc10:~/trunk/build/gcc$ size a.out-old
>>> >>>>>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>>> >>>>>  608141    3560   16728  628429   996cd a.out-old
>>> >>>>> jh@gcc10:~/trunk/build/gcc$ size a.out-new
>>> >>>>>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>>> >>>>>  612621    3688   22880  639189   9c0d5 a.out-new
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Without profiling I get:
>>> >>>>> jh@gcc10:~/trunk/build/gcc$ size a.out-new-no
>>> >>>>> jh@gcc10:~/trunk/build/gcc$ size a.out-old-no
>>> >>>>>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>>> >>>>>  599719    3448   12568  615735   96537 a.out-old-no
>>> >>>>>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>>> >>>>>  600247    3448   12568  616263   96747 a.out-new-no
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Quite big for empty program, but mostly glibc fault, I suppose
>>> >>>>> (that won't be an issue for embedded platforms). But anyway
>>> >>>>> we increased text size overhead from 8k to 12k, BSS size
>>> >>>>> overhead from 4k to 10k and data by another 1k.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>>> >>>>>     126       0       0     126      7e _gcov_merge_add.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     251       0       0     251      fb _gcov_merge_single.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     242       0       0     242      f2 _gcov_merge_delta.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     126       0       0     126      7e _gcov_merge_ior.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     156       0       0     156      9c _gcov_merge_time_profile.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      89       0       0      89      59 _gcov_interval_profiler.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      69       0       0      69      45 _gcov_pow2_profiler.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     115       0       0     115      73 _gcov_one_value_profiler.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     122       0       0     122      7a _gcov_indirect_call_profiler.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      57       0       0      57      39 _gcov_average_profiler.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      52       0       0      52      34 _gcov_ior_profiler.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     178       0      16     194      c2 _gcov_indirect_call_profiler_v2.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      77       0       8      85      55 _gcov_time_profiler.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     126       0      40     166      a6 _gcov_flush.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     101       0       0     101      65 _gcov_fork.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     471       0       0     471     1d7 _gcov_execl.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     471       0       0     471     1d7 _gcov_execlp.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     524       0       0     524     20c _gcov_execle.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      98       0       0      98      62 _gcov_execv.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      98       0       0      98      62 _gcov_execvp.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     108       0       0     108      6c _gcov_execve.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      66       0       0      66      42 _gcov_reset.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      66       0       0      66      42 _gcov_dump.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>    9505       0    6144   15649    3d21 _gcov.o (ex libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I think we definitely need to move those 6k of bss space out.  I think those are new
>>> >>>>> static vars you introduced that I think are unsafe anyway because multiple streaming
>>> >>>>> may run at once in threaded program where locking mechanizm fails.
>>> >>>>> (it will probably do other bad things, but definitely we do not want to
>>> >>>>> conflict on things like filename to write into).
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Compared to my system gcov:
>>> >>>>>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>>> >>>>>    9765       0      64    9829    2665 _gcov.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     125       0       0     125      7d _gcov_merge_add.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     251       0       0     251      fb _gcov_merge_single.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     242       0       0     242      f2 _gcov_merge_delta.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     101       0       0     101      65 _gcov_fork.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     471       0       0     471     1d7 _gcov_execl.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     471       0       0     471     1d7 _gcov_execlp.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     524       0       0     524     20c _gcov_execle.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      98       0       0      98      62 _gcov_execv.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      98       0       0      98      62 _gcov_execvp.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     108       0       0     108      6c _gcov_execve.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      72       0       0      72      48 _gcov_reset.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      72       0       0      72      48 _gcov_dump.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      89       0       0      89      59 _gcov_interval_profiler.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      69       0       0      69      45 _gcov_pow2_profiler.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     115       0       0     115      73 _gcov_one_value_profiler.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     122       0       0     122      7a _gcov_indirect_call_profiler.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      57       0       0      57      39 _gcov_average_profiler.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>      52       0       0      52      34 _gcov_ior_profiler.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>     125       0       0     125      7d _gcov_merge_ior.o (ex ./lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/libgcov.a)
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Index: gcc/gcov-io.h
>>> >>>>>> ===================================================================
>>> >>>>>> --- gcc/gcov-io.h     (revision 204895)
>>> >>>>>> +++ gcc/gcov-io.h     (working copy)
>>> >>>>>> @@ -164,51 +164,7 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respect
>>> >>>>>>  #ifndef GCC_GCOV_IO_H
>>> >>>>>>  #define GCC_GCOV_IO_H
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> -#if IN_LIBGCOV
>>> >>>>>> -/* About the target */
>>> >>>>>> -
>>> >>>>>> -#if BITS_PER_UNIT == 8
>>> >>>>>> -typedef unsigned gcov_unsigned_t __attribute__ ((mode (SI)));
>>> >>>>>> -typedef unsigned gcov_position_t __attribute__ ((mode (SI)));
>>> >>>>>> -#if LONG_LONG_TYPE_SIZE > 32
>>> >>>>>> -typedef signed gcov_type __attribute__ ((mode (DI)));
>>> >>>>>> -typedef unsigned gcov_type_unsigned __attribute__ ((mode (DI)));
>>> >>>>>> -#else
>>> >>>>>> -typedef signed gcov_type __attribute__ ((mode (SI)));
>>> >>>>>> -typedef unsigned gcov_type_unsigned __attribute__ ((mode (SI)));
>>> >>>>>> -#endif
>>> >>>>>> -#else
>>> >>>>>> -#if BITS_PER_UNIT == 16
>>> >>>>>> -typedef unsigned gcov_unsigned_t __attribute__ ((mode (HI)));
>>> >>>>>> -typedef unsigned gcov_position_t __attribute__ ((mode (HI)));
>>> >>>>>> -#if LONG_LONG_TYPE_SIZE > 32
>>> >>>>>> -typedef signed gcov_type __attribute__ ((mode (SI)));
>>> >>>>>> -typedef unsigned gcov_type_unsigned __attribute__ ((mode (SI)));
>>> >>>>>> -#else
>>> >>>>>> -typedef signed gcov_type __attribute__ ((mode (HI)));
>>> >>>>>> -typedef unsigned gcov_type_unsigned __attribute__ ((mode (HI)));
>>> >>>>>> -#endif
>>> >>>>>> -#else
>>> >>>>>> -typedef unsigned gcov_unsigned_t __attribute__ ((mode (QI)));
>>> >>>>>> -typedef unsigned gcov_position_t __attribute__ ((mode (QI)));
>>> >>>>>> -#if LONG_LONG_TYPE_SIZE > 32
>>> >>>>>> -typedef signed gcov_type __attribute__ ((mode (HI)));
>>> >>>>>> -typedef unsigned gcov_type_unsigned __attribute__ ((mode (HI)));
>>> >>>>>> -#else
>>> >>>>>> -typedef signed gcov_type __attribute__ ((mode (QI)));
>>> >>>>>> -typedef unsigned gcov_type_unsigned __attribute__ ((mode (QI)));
>>> >>>>>> -#endif
>>> >>>>>> -#endif
>>> >>>>>> -#endif
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> So this part basically moves libgcov specific bits into libgcov.h? That OK fine by
>>> >>>>> itself.
>>> >>>>>> Index: libgcc/libgcov-profiler.c
>>> >>>>>> ===================================================================
>>> >>>>>> --- libgcc/libgcov-profiler.c (revision 204895)
>>> >>>>>> +++ libgcc/libgcov-profiler.c (working copy)
>>> >>>>>> @@ -23,15 +23,8 @@ a copy of the GCC Runtime Library Exception along
>>> >>>>>>  see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively.  If not, see
>>> >>>>>>  <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> -#include "tconfig.h"
>>> >>>>>> -#include "tsystem.h"
>>> >>>>>> -#include "coretypes.h"
>>> >>>>>> -#include "tm.h"
>>> >>>>>> -#include "libgcc_tm.h"
>>> >>>>>> -
>>> >>>>>> +#include "libgcov.h"
>>> >>>>>>  #if !defined(inhibit_libc)
>>> >>>>>> -#define IN_LIBGCOV 1
>>> >>>>>> -#include "gcov-io.h"
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I did not pay that much attention into the current include file changes, but wasn't
>>> >>>>> idea to avoid #include file to include random other #includes?
>>> >>>>> So perhaps the first block of includes should stay, followed by libgcov.h and gcov-io.h
>>> >>>>> last?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I'm not sure I understand the issue here? The patch basically moves
>>> >>>> the same includes into libgcov.h, and includes that instead. I see
>>> >>>> many other header files in gcc that include other headers.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>>> @@ -325,6 +311,9 @@ static struct gcov_summary all_prg;
>>> >>>>>>  #endif
>>> >>>>>>  /* crc32 for this program.  */
>>> >>>>>>  static gcov_unsigned_t crc32;
>>> >>>>>> +/* Use this summary checksum rather the computed one if the value is
>>> >>>>>> + *    non-zero.  */
>>> >>>>>> +static gcov_unsigned_t saved_summary_checksum;
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Why do you need to save the checksum? Won't it reset summary back with multiple streaming?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> This has been removed.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I would really like to avoid introducing those static vars that are used exclusively
>>> >>>>> by gcov_exit.  What about putting them into an gcov_context structure that
>>> >>>>> is passed around the functions that was broken out?
>>> >>>>>> Index: libgcc/libgcov-merge.c
>>> >>>>>> ===================================================================
>>> >>>>>> --- libgcc/libgcov-merge.c    (revision 204895)
>>> >>>>>> +++ libgcc/libgcov-merge.c    (working copy)
>>> >>>>>> @@ -23,107 +23,150 @@ a copy of the GCC Runtime Library Exception along
>>> >>>>>>  see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively.  If not, see
>>> >>>>>>  <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> -#include "tconfig.h"
>>> >>>>>> -#include "tsystem.h"
>>> >>>>>> -#include "coretypes.h"
>>> >>>>>> -#include "tm.h"
>>> >>>>>> -#include "libgcc_tm.h"
>>> >>>>>> +#include "libgcov.h"
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> -#if defined(inhibit_libc)
>>> >>>>>> -#define IN_LIBGCOV (-1)
>>> >>>>>> -#else
>>> >>>>>> -#define IN_LIBGCOV 1
>>> >>>>>> +#include "gcov-io-libgcov.h"
>>> >>>>>>  #endif
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> -#include "gcov-io.h"
>>> >>>>>> -
>>> >>>>>>  #if defined(inhibit_libc)
>>> >>>>>>  /* If libc and its header files are not available, provide dummy functions.  */
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>  #ifdef L_gcov_merge_add
>>> >>>>>>  void __gcov_merge_add (gcov_type *counters  __attribute__ ((unused)),
>>> >>>>>> -                       unsigned n_counters __attribute__ ((unused))) {}
>>> >>>>>> +                       unsigned n_counters __attribute__ ((unused)),
>>> >>>>>> +                       unsigned gcov_type *src __attribute__ ((unused)),
>>> >>>>>> +                       unsigned w __attribute__ ((unused))) {}
>>> >>>>>>  #endif
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>  #ifdef L_gcov_merge_single
>>> >>>>>>  void __gcov_merge_single (gcov_type *counters  __attribute__ ((unused)),
>>> >>>>>> -                          unsigned n_counters __attribute__ ((unused))) {}
>>> >>>>>> +                          unsigned n_counters __attribute__ ((unused)),
>>> >>>>>> +                          unsigned gcov_type *src __attribute__ ((unused)),
>>> >>>>>> +                          unsigned w __attribute__ ((unused))) {}
>>> >>>>>>  #endif
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>  #ifdef L_gcov_merge_delta
>>> >>>>>>  void __gcov_merge_delta (gcov_type *counters  __attribute__ ((unused)),
>>> >>>>>> -                         unsigned n_counters __attribute__ ((unused))) {}
>>> >>>>>> +                         unsigned n_counters __attribute__ ((unused)),
>>> >>>>>> +                         unsigned gcov_type *src __attribute__ ((unused)),
>>> >>>>>> +                         unsigned w __attribute__ ((unused))) {}
>>> >>>>>>  #endif
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>  #else
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>  #ifdef L_gcov_merge_add
>>> >>>>>>  /* The profile merging function that just adds the counters.  It is given
>>> >>>>>> -   an array COUNTERS of N_COUNTERS old counters and it reads the same number
>>> >>>>>> -   of counters from the gcov file.  */
>>> >>>>>> +   an array COUNTERS of N_COUNTERS old counters.
>>> >>>>>> +   When SRC==NULL, it reads the same number of counters from the gcov file.
>>> >>>>>> +   Otherwise, it reads from SRC array. These read values will be multiplied
>>> >>>>>> +   by weight W before adding to the old counters.  */
>>> >>>>>>  void
>>> >>>>>> -__gcov_merge_add (gcov_type *counters, unsigned n_counters)
>>> >>>>>> +__gcov_merge_add (gcov_type *counters, unsigned n_counters,
>>> >>>>>> +                  gcov_type *src, unsigned w)
>>> >>>>>>  {
>>> >>>>>> +  int in_mem = (src != 0);
>>> >>>>>> +
>>> >>>>>>    for (; n_counters; counters++, n_counters--)
>>> >>>>>> -    *counters += gcov_read_counter ();
>>> >>>>>> +    {
>>> >>>>>> +      gcov_type value;
>>> >>>>>> +
>>> >>>>>> +      if (in_mem)
>>> >>>>>> +        value = *(src++);
>>> >>>>>> +      else
>>> >>>>>> +        value = gcov_read_counter ();
>>> >>>>>> +
>>> >>>>>> +      *counters += w * value;
>>> >>>>>> +    }
>>> >>>>>>  }
>>> >>>>>>  #endif /* L_gcov_merge_add */
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>  #ifdef L_gcov_merge_ior
>>> >>>>>>  /* The profile merging function that just adds the counters.  It is given
>>> >>>>>> -   an array COUNTERS of N_COUNTERS old counters and it reads the same number
>>> >>>>>> -   of counters from the gcov file.  */
>>> >>>>>> +   an array COUNTERS of N_COUNTERS old counters.
>>> >>>>>> +   When SRC==NULL, it reads the same number of counters from the gcov file.
>>> >>>>>> +   Otherwise, it reads from SRC array.  */
>>> >>>>>>  void
>>> >>>>>> -__gcov_merge_ior (gcov_type *counters, unsigned n_counters)
>>> >>>>>> +__gcov_merge_ior (gcov_type *counters, unsigned n_counters,
>>> >>>>>> +                  gcov_type *src, unsigned w __attribute__ ((unused)))
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> So the new in-memory variants are introduced for merging tool, while libgcc use gcov_read_counter
>>> >>>>> interface?
>>> >>>>> Perhaps we can actually just duplicate the functions to avoid runtime to do all the scalling
>>> >>>>> and in_mem tests it won't need?
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I would suggest going with libgcov.h changes and clenaups first, with interface changes next
>>> >>>>> and the gcov-tool is probably quite obvious at the end?
>>> >>>>> Do you think you can split the patch this way?
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Thanks and sorry for taking long to review. I should have more time again now.
>>> >>>>> Honza
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> The libgcov.h related changes are in the attached patch. I think it
>>> >>>> addresses your concerns. Bootstrapped and tested on
>>> >>>> x86-64-unknown-linux-gnu. A profiledbootstrap is in progress.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Ok for trunk if profiledbootstrap passes?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Both a profiledbootstrap and LTO profiledbootstrap pass.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Teresa
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Thanks,
>>> >>>> Teresa
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohnson@google.com | 408-460-2413
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohnson@google.com | 408-460-2413
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohnson@google.com | 408-460-2413



-- 
Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohnson@google.com | 408-460-2413


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]