This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFA: revert libstdc++ r205810: simulator workload increase caused regression
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
- Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Yufeng Zhang <Yufeng dot Zhang at arm dot com>, Renlin Li <Renlin dot Li at arm dot com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:09:27 +0000
- Subject: Re: RFA: revert libstdc++ r205810: simulator workload increase caused regression
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <201312151420 dot rBFEKmYh018239 at ignucius dot se dot axis dot com> <201312160422 dot rBG4M5dF026966 at ignucius dot se dot axis dot com>
(Sorry for my very brief reply the other day, I was on my phone and so
using gmail is a pain.)
On 16 December 2013 04:22, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
>> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:20:48 +0100
>
>> +// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x -DSAMPLES=30000" { target { { arm*-* } && simulator } } }
>> +// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x -DSAMPLES=10000" { target simulator } }
>
> JFTR, I managed to have two bugs here:
> 1 - the target tuple (unless being an "effective target") must match "*-*-*".
> 2 - the *last* matching line is used.
>
> But as mentioned, I'd prefer to split chi2_quality.cc into
> (five) separate tests, if a maintainer would be ok with that.
Yes, if that solves the problem for everyone I'll approve that.