This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch i386]: Fix PR 56807


2013/12/16 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 06:06:14PM +0100, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> --- config/i386/i386.c    (Revision 205719)
>> +++ config/i386/i386.c    (Arbeitskopie)
>> @@ -10934,18 +10937,21 @@ ix86_expand_prologue (void)
>>      }
>>        m->fs.sp_offset += allocate;
>>
>> +      /* Use stack_pointer_rtx for relative addressing so that code
>> +     works for realigned stack, too.  */
>>        if (r10_live && eax_live)
>>          {
>> -      t = choose_baseaddr (m->fs.sp_offset - allocate);
>> +      t = plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, allocate);
>>        emit_move_insn (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, R10_REG),
>>                gen_frame_mem (word_mode, t));
>> -      t = choose_baseaddr (m->fs.sp_offset - allocate - UNITS_PER_WORD);
>> +      t = plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
>> +                 allocate - UNITS_PER_WORD);
>
> Somebody just asked on IRC whether this shouldn't have been
> allocate + UNITS_PER_WORD.

Well, I had over weekend same discussion on irc.  AFAIR it was BugMaster ...
and yes, in the case (for x86_64 possible only) that r10_live and
eax_live there seems to be a bug.

The addressing of save-region for r10, which is saved after rax, is
correct.  The restore-address of rax is wrong.  It should be
         t = plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
                            allocate + UNITS_PER_WORD);
instead.

> Dunno when would be eax_live true on x86_64 though (except for uninitialized
> var uses).
>

Kai


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]