This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly Elemental functions) for C
- From: "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji dot v dot iyer at intel dot com>
- To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, "'gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:37:22 +0000
- Subject: RE: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly Elemental functions) for C
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A4ACA4E at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A4AFEF8 at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <52A25AB2 dot 8090200 at redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A4B060E at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <52A7574D dot 4000403 at redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A4B11FC at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <52A8A313 dot 5000903 at redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A4B1266 at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <692196649 dot 15162937 dot 1386786392062 dot JavaMail dot root at zmail15 dot collab dot prod dot int dot phx2 dot redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A4B1298 at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <52A9D58D dot 2040004 at redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A4B170C at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <52AA1C79 dot 6060306 at redhat dot com> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A4B1ADC at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <52AB4673 dot 6060808 at redhat dot com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Aldy Hernandez
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 12:40 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: Jakub Jelinek; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly
> Elemental functions) for C
>
> > + /* Two CPP_EOF token is added as a safety-net since the normal C
> > + front-end has two token look-ahead. */
>
> "Two CPP_EOF tokens are added"... Also, "safety net" are two words, not
> one hyphenated one.
>
> Otherwise, I'm fine with the present patch. It's up to Jakub or another global
> reviewer to give the final approval.
Here is the fixed patch with the above changes.
So, is it OK for trunk/branch?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
>
> Aldy
Attachment:
diff5.txt
Description: diff5.txt