This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [wide-int] small cleanup in wide-int.*


could be.
On 11/29/2013 06:57 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Looks good to me FWIW, except:

Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com> writes:
@@ -112,11 +114,11 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
     two, the default is the prefered representation.
All three flavors of wide_int are represented as a vector of
-   HOST_WIDE_INTs.  The default and widest_int vectors contain enough elements
-   to hold a value of MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT bits.  offset_int contains only
-   enough elements to hold ADDR_MAX_PRECISION bits.  The values are stored
-   in the vector with the least significant HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT bits
-   in element 0.
+   HOST_WIDE_INTs.  The default and widest_int vectors contain enough
+   elements to hold a value of MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT bits.
+   offset_int contains only enough elements to hold ADDR_MAX_PRECISION
+   bits.  The values are stored in the vector with the least
+   significant HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT bits in element 0.
The default wide_int contains three fields: the vector (VAL),
     the precision and a length (LEN).  The length is the number of HWIs
is this just changing the line breaks?

Thanks,
Richard


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]