This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep dot dot dot nop at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, "Iyer, Balaji V" <balaji dot v dot iyer at intel dot com>, Iain Sandoe <iain at codesourcery dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>, gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:01:54 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A49B1E8 at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <20131105172036 dot GO27813 at tucnak dot zalov dot cz> <BF230D13CA30DD48930C31D4099330003A49BAB2 at FMSMSX101 dot amr dot corp dot intel dot com> <20131106070450 dot GT27813 at tucnak dot zalov dot cz> <CAC1BbcQDtx64ps4X2uXH9THpzzo6jVNF9DUJwVm_RbMM0HHvsw at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Nov 8, 2013, at 4:09 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 November 2013 08:04, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:24:01AM +0000, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
>>> Fixed patch is attached. The responses to your question are given below. Is this patch OK?
> May i suggest you rephrase the .exp so it does not line-wrap and is
> actually readable like in attached (untested) 01 or at least 00?
I like the direction irrespective of line length. :-)