This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] Make vector::at() assertion message more useful (try #2)
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
- Cc: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com>, Daniel KrÃgler <daniel dot kruegler at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:22:50 +0200
- Subject: Re: [patch] Make vector::at() assertion message more useful (try #2)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <ye6qhae0qpf8 dot fsf at elbrus2 dot mtv dot corp dot google dot com> <CAGNvRgDfHf6pYmBYC66HHhj6RobhiaiAAVEKj1FDxSWGxbYFTg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CALoOobMf3u8R_DVW5b2eRy05fBpB5unhriLMYdUEkT_E3DwtaA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAGNvRgD6mK=-n7QhK=-NtfXZHOpCniXKc-riWUNfqZeVa8xufQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CALoOobO6XEsrSM6jJFCQ=n00iY8qM=eujs-=LixNZyuya5f-cA at mail dot gmail dot com> <5232E2AF dot 4000106 at oracle dot com> <CALoOobMejGJLVVCszP8Joa+4B21UbvK4chyFUnjiCNPP0GJF0A at mail dot gmail dot com> <mvma9j35377 dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <52402567 dot 2080407 at oracle dot com> <mvm1u4f4v81 dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <11cc3fe3-a8b9-43ff-a614-d4f374447236 at email dot android dot com>
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> writes:
> Hi
>
> Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> ha scritto:
>
>>What's wrong with always adding the instantiation?
>
> That quite a few targets will not use it and will remain dead in the .so?
How many uses are there for the unsigned long version?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."