This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [FIXED] Generic lambda symbol table bug

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Adam Butcher <adam at jessamine dot co dot uk>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, Andrew Sutton <andrew dot n dot sutton at gmail dot com>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 22:01:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [FIXED] Generic lambda symbol table bug
References: <52001874 dot 5050105 at redhat dot com> <1375861956-11593-1-git-send-email-adam at jessamine dot co dot uk> <52026EC6 dot 6060605 at redhat dot com> <7ac5b3090b98d245da255ee325477b16 at imap dot force9 dot net> <21ece1f2d5f936fdb0501c3178d7ad9a at imap dot force9 dot net>

On 08/08/2013 06:28 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:

So all seems to be okay with both versions.  Any ideas why?

Hmm, it sounds like processing_template_decl is being set after all,even without your change.


Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [FIXED] Generic lambda symbol table bug
  - From: Adam Butcher

References:
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] [lambda] Support implicit conversion of a stateless generic lambda to a function pointer.
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [FIXED] Generic lambda symbol table bug
  - From: Adam Butcher
- Re: [FIXED] Generic lambda symbol table bug
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [FIXED] Generic lambda symbol table bug
  - From: Adam Butcher
- Re: [FIXED] Generic lambda symbol table bug
  - From: Adam Butcher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]