Build broken (was: [PATCH 02/11] Generate pass-instances.def)

[Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl dot de>]

On Tue, 2013-07-30 20:50:27 -0400, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
> Committed to trunk as r201359, having double-checked that it
> bootstrapped by itself on top of what had gone before, and that the
> testsuite results were unaffected by it (on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu).

My build robot chokes on it. The list of tested targets, that broke,
is:

	cris
	fr30-elf
	iq2000-elf
	m32r-elf
	microblazeel-linux
	mmix
	ppc-linux
	rl78-elf
	sh64-linux
	spu-elf
	tilegx-linux
	tilepro-linux

It's breaking with:

[...]
mawk -f ../../../../gcc/gcc/gen-pass-instances.awk \
          ../../../../gcc/gcc/passes.def > pass-instances.def
g++ -c   -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE  -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../gcc/gcc -I../../../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include  -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I../../../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace    ../../../../gcc/gcc/passes.c -o passes.o
./pass-instances.def: In constructor âgcc::pass_manager::pass_manager(gcc::context*)â:
./pass-instances.def:36:14: error: âpass_warn_unused_resulâ was not declared in this scope
   NEXT_PASS (pass_warn_unused_resul, 1);
              ^
../../../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1318:55: note: in definition of macro âNEXT_PASSâ
 #define NEXT_PASS(PASS, NUM)  (p = next_pass_1 (p, &((PASS).pass)))
                                                       ^
./pass-instances.def:37:14: error: âpass_diagnose_omp_blockâ was not declared in this scope
   NEXT_PASS (pass_diagnose_omp_block, 1);
              ^
../../../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1318:55: note: in definition of macro âNEXT_PASSâ
 #define NEXT_PASS(PASS, NUM)  (p = next_pass_1 (p, &((PASS).pass)))
                                                       ^
./pass-instances.def:38:14: error: âpass_diagnose_tm_blockâ was not declared in this scope
   NEXT_PASS (pass_diagnose_tm_block, 1);
              ^
../../../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1318:55: note: in definition of macro âNEXT_PASSâ
 #define NEXT_PASS(PASS, NUM)  (p = next_pass_1 (p, &((PASS).pass)))
                                                       ^
./pass-instances.def:39:14: error: âpass_mudflap_â was not declared in this scope
   NEXT_PASS (pass_mudflap_, 1);
              ^
../../../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1318:55: note: in definition of macro âNEXT_PASSâ
 #define NEXT_PASS(PASS, NUM)  (p = next_pass_1 (p, &((PASS).pass)))
                                                       ^
./pass-instances.def:40:14: error: âpass_lower_omâ was not declared in this scope
   NEXT_PASS (pass_lower_om, 1);
              ^
[...]

It seems this does only happen on one of the three running build
clients. That one is using `mawk' instead of `gawk', what the two
other builders (which are not affected) use.

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbglaw@lug-owl.de              +49-172-7608481
 Signature of:                    Don't believe in miracles: Rely on them!
 the second  :

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature