This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch x86/darwin] fix PR51784 'PIC register not correctly preserved...'
- From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
- To: Iain Sandoe <iain at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 10:15:49 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Patch x86/darwin] fix PR51784 'PIC register not correctly preserved...'
- References: <CAFULd4Z+dQJfKOq-qx2aJt2-6cPjyZ6rmNU0yd47GLyjHbB3SQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <0809E02A-4977-46C5-A97F-83DBDC05B460 at codesourcery dot com> <CAFULd4Z_+v30K7ByxA14hKZtQs80zhXUMxVwVdc8YAoxw406Lg at mail dot gmail dot com> <E56CCB11-39AB-4A60-AEBD-C514F5258632 at codesourcery dot com> <CAFULd4Za2uUcbYcczBoQ5LqpU-LrxHn2TLoqXytRKKUujSuiiw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130719210009 dot GB23578 at laptop dot redhat dot com> <CAFULd4agWAgfk_-ey_mYgHYYMYY2-KsfAjxC0y2A_xSoute_sQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <3FEAE1B1-0BAE-417B-AC49-78222D289518 at codesourcery dot com>
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Iain Sandoe <iain@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> <p.diff.txt>
>
> Sure, I can test that - do you want me to apply it assuming it reg-tests OK on darwin & linux?
> (also I can amend the back ports - since I didn't have time to get to them yesterday)
Yes, please test it on darwin. The build test on linux went OK.
However, the change is not effective on linux, so I have no means to
properly test it by myself.
If everything is OK, please also use this change in backports.
The ChangeLog is attached below.
2013-07-21 Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
* config/i386/i386.md (nonlocal_goto_receiver): Delete insn if
it is not needed after split.
Thanks,
Uros.