This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: List of typos.
- From: Georg-Johann Lay <gjl at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>
- Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Veres Lajos <vlajos at gmail dot com>
- Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 19:54:34 +0200
- Subject: Re: List of typos.
- References: <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 00 dot 1307030946410 dot 8850 at citymarket dot hu> <20130703084440 dot GA11873 at virgil dot suse> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 00 dot 1307031107230 dot 8850 at citymarket dot hu> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 00 dot 1307040438220 dot 8850 at citymarket dot hu> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1307040903350 dot 25651 at stedding dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <CAH6eHdT4OJ6J-wPAbXQn6RzKUcTBC9H8TqmDXtdQT_efn3FAtA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130705154318 dot GA26780 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <CAH6eHdTb_KBzAhf1Wnbhrdj2T4+TEuoMd5__AkPKGj_X8v9hmQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130706054417 dot GA1849 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <CAH6eHdTL6vfYC9z4kMpcVJO+u9hBtTHnwshU+zULaFYqxdW07Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130707142115 dot GA5209 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Ondrej Bilka schrieb:
http://kam.mff.cuni.cz/~ondra/gcc_misspell.patch
This is wrong:
@@ -10834,7 +10834,7 @@ avr_convert_to_type (tree type, tree expr)
XOP[2] # Bytes to copy
Return TRUE if the expansion is accomplished.
- Return FALSE if the operand compination is not supported. */
+ Return FALSE if the operand compilation is not supported. */
Should be "combination" not "compilation".
index 406617f..c7a7f7b 100644
--- a/gcc/config/frv/frv-opts.h
+++ b/gcc/config/frv/frv-opts.h
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* Frv option-handling defitions.
+/* Frv option-handling deviations.
Should be "definitions" instead of "deviations".
-/* Expand SYMBOL into its corresponding far-addresse symbol.
+/* Expand SYMBOL into its corresponding far-addressee symbol.
Is this correct or should be "far-address"?
@@ -5336,7 +5336,7 @@ pa_print_operand (FILE *file, rtx x, int code)
&& GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (x, 0), 1)) == REG)
{
/* Because the REG_POINTER flag can get lost during reload,
- pa_legitimate_address_p canonicalizes the order of the
+ pa_legitimate_address_p canonizes the order of the
I am not sure about this one and many others. "canonicalize" sounds ok
to me, so does "canonicalization". "canonize" sounds odd to me. For
example the following which should change none or both:
-/* Canonicalize the filename NAME by canonicalizing directory
+/* Canonicalize the filename NAME by canonizing directory
- * Unique vinsn derivates from CALL, ASM, JUMP (for a while) and other
+ * Unique vinsn derivatives from CALL, ASM, JUMP (for a while) and other
Shouldn't this be "derives"?
- /* Merge c_expres found or unify live register sets from different
+ /* Merge c_express found or unify live register sets from different
Some lines above in sel-sched.c there is "C_EXPRes". Again, change none
or both (none seems fine here):
- /* Test exponentials and their signs. A buggy lexer is more likely
+ /* Test exponential and their signs. A buggy lexer is more likely
Should both be plural or singular. "exponents" sounds good to me.
- Roger Sayle <...@eyesopen.com>
+ Roger Sayle <...@eyes open.com>
Don't change email addresses!
Johann