This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Ping]RE: [PATCH,ARM] Fix PR57329 - backport to gcc 4.8

From: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramrad01 at arm dot com>
To: Terry Guo <Terry dot Guo at arm dot com>
Cc: Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:34:13 +0100
Subject: Re: [Ping]RE: [PATCH,ARM] Fix PR57329 - backport to gcc 4.8
References: <000201ce73e6$58d17f40$0a747dc0$ at arm dot com>

On 06/28/13 11:00, Terry Guo wrote:

Ping.

BR,
Terry

-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Terry Guo
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 6:02 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
Subject: [PATCH,ARM] Fix PR57329 - backport to gcc 4.8

Hello,

This patch (trunk r197155)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-03/msg00784.html
fixes an ICE in gcc 4.8:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57329

OK to backport to 4.8 branch?  Tested with 4.8 regression test on QEMU, no
new regression.


Ok if no regressions and no RM objects in 24 hours.

Ramana


BR,
Terry

References:
- [Ping]RE: [PATCH,ARM] Fix PR57329 - backport to gcc 4.8
  - From: Terry Guo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]