This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Improve folding of bitwise ops feeding conditionals for single bit types
- From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep dot dot dot nop at gmail dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:02:51 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve folding of bitwise ops feeding conditionals for single bit types
- References: <51C12EC5 dot 709 at redhat dot com> <CADj25HPLDB8=-oa1ki0doSLWDKG8vnJDTD0g4WrDApFZXw-4Jg at mail dot gmail dot com> <51C1B8C4 dot 1050802 at redhat dot com>
On 19 June 2013 15:57, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/19/2013 01:02 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
>>
>> 2013/6/19 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-28.c: New test.
>>>
>>
>> In the gnu coding standard we have a space before
>> the open-parentheses. Would that be great to have
>> testcase follow this convention as well? :)
>>
>> If so, then...
>
> No reason not to fix the test in this instance. I'll make these updates
> before committing.
eh, nitpicking party ?
+ If a simplification is mode, return TRUE, else return FALSE. */
+static bool
+simplify_bitwise_binary_boolean (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi,
s/mode/made/
Sounds nice, otherwise!
thanks,