This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DATA_ABI_ALIGNMENT (PR target/56564)
- From: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Igor Zamyatin <izamyatin at gmail dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:38:47 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] DATA_ALIGNMENT vs. DATA_ABI_ALIGNMENT (PR target/56564)
- References: <CAKdSQZkifGa2u=54MxTmBPX5xcRK3Xna=61h4RRP_aT3ASrLMw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130619072213 dot GK2336 at tucnak dot redhat dot com>
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:12:21AM +0400, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
>> Right, as you did for other cases. It works here as well.
>
> Patch preapproved.
I wonder how much code breaks these days when we enable -fno-common by
default? ...
Richard.