This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Committed] S/390: PR57609 fix - use next_active_insn instead of next_real_insn
- From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:35:50 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Committed] S/390: PR57609 fix - use next_active_insn instead of next_real_insn
- References: <20130618085730 dot GA17947 at bart> <CABu31nN--z7tOCLEbvicg1+J6m0_ZSscaRtnhNxW3oMKn1nfDA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CADj25HPJe77y_+Je_6sK8oM-d_YZG_pUtc8FfxQLWSFQagzdjg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
> Do you mean that your comment 6 in PR56809 is not a good solution
> since you are going to remove JUMP_TABLE_DAT from active_insn_p ??
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56809
No, that one I'll fix, it's fall-out from the JUMP_TABLE_DATA change
and thus my responsibility to fix.
Ciao!
Steven