This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Committed] S/390: PR57609 fix - use next_active_insn instead of next_real_insn
- From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:59:56 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Committed] S/390: PR57609 fix - use next_active_insn instead of next_real_insn
- References: <20130618085730 dot GA17947 at bart>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Andreas Krebbel
<krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the patch replaces next_real_insn with next_active_insn when checking
> for JUMP TABLE insns.
>
> This fixes ESA mode bootstrap on s390 which broke with r197266.
>
> Comitted to mainline
Please revert this and find another solution. JUMP_TABLE_DATA is not
an active insn, and I will be removing it soon from active_insn_p.
How big does a FIXME have to be for people to notice?
Ciao!
Steven