This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Path] PR 38958

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:46:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [C++ Path] PR 38958
References: <51B89A91 dot 2010204 at oracle dot com> <51B8A477 dot 7020304 at redhat dot com> <4f4a9cc8-5452-43fc-b224-48bddba8eed1 at email dot android dot com> <aa426103-479a-4bf3-b3fe-88596d26ec51 at email dot android dot com>

On 06/12/2013 01:37 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

Rewording: as the one line comment says, I only call non_reference at the outset when I know that either we'll end up producing the normal unused-variable warning or nothing at all.

Oh, I see. But that's a rather subtle difference; better to have 'type'mean something consistent and leave the unused-but-set code checkingTREE_TYPE (decl).


Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ Path] PR 38958
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [C++ Path] PR 38958
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Path] PR 38958
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [C++ Path] PR 38958
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Path] PR 38958
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]