This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix incorrect discriminator assignment.


Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> writes:

> And why do you add -gdwarf-2 in dg-options?  AFAICS all tests in
> gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2 are built with -gdwarf-2 anyway.

Do they?  Not here.

Executing on host: /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20130530/Build/gcc/xgcc -B/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20130530/Build/gcc/ /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20130530/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/discriminator.c  -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never  -ansi -pedantic-errors -O0 -ffat-lto-objects -ffat-lto-objects -ffat-lto-objects -S  -o discriminator.s    (timeout = 300)
spawn /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20130530/Build/gcc/xgcc -B/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20130530/Build/gcc/ /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20130530/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/discriminator.c -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -ansi -pedantic-errors -O0 -ffat-lto-objects -ffat-lto-objects -ffat-lto-objects -S -o discriminator.s
PASS: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/discriminator.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/discriminator.c scan-assembler loc [0-9] 11 [0-9]( is_stmt [0-9])?\n
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/discriminator.c scan-assembler loc [0-9] 11 [0-9]( is_stmt [0-9])? discriminator 2\n
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/discriminator.c scan-assembler loc [0-9] 11 [0-9]( is_stmt [0-9])? discriminator 1\n

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]