This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: web ICEs on subreg

From: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>
To: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org List" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 20:27:42 -0400
Subject: Re: web ICEs on subreg
References: <D0C5078B-F760-49AF-83DA-26B8CC221A16 at comcast dot net> <CABu31nPKp+99_7jykiYihXjAZoh1zpXV2GuQzq7pXYVsNhG=9g at mail dot gmail dot com> <DA76E8AE-F19D-4C13-B743-36DE8A5BA139 at comcast dot net>

Assuming the patch has been tested on a public port, it is ok for commit.

kenny
On 05/10/2013 06:52 PM, Mike Stump wrote:

On May 10, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:

Your web.c patch looks correct to me, but I can't approve it.

Thanks.  Now that you point out the DF accessor, it all makes perfect sense.  :-)  I've fixed one other instance that has to be as wrong for all the same reasons.  Though my port doesn't trip the other case from the test suite, if my port used an IN/OUT, I bet I could make it trip it.

Ok?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: web ICEs on subreg
  - From: Mike Stump

References:
- web ICEs on subreg
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: web ICEs on subreg
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: web ICEs on subreg
  - From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]