This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Ping. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-04/msg00272.htmlAlso pending: use-associated NULL() at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-05/msg00006.html
Tobias Burnus wrote:
The issue was found by Reinhold Bader when testing the Fortran-Dev branch (thanks!), but it also affects GCC 4.6 and later.The patch is rather obvious: The segfault occured as tail->u.ar.start[i] == NULL. An alternative is to could use "continue" instead of "break".Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux. OK for the trunk? TobiasPS: The test case is invalid Fortran 2003 but valid Fortran 2008. As gfortran lacks that feature, it unconditionally rejects the test case. Work around is to add a "(1)" to the alloc-expr.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |