This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][10/10] -fuse-caller-save - Add test-case


Tom de Vries <tom@codesourcery.com> writes:
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-options "-fuse-caller-save -save-temps" } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* }  { "*" } { "-Os" } } */
> +/* Testing -fuse-caller-save optimization option.  */
> +
> +static int __attribute__((noinline))
> +bar (int x)
> +{
> +  return x + 3;
> +}
> +
> +int __attribute__((noinline))
> +foo (int y)
> +{
> +  return y + bar (y);
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main (void)
> +{
> +  return !(foo (5) == 13);
> +}
> +
> +/* Check that there are only 2 stack-saves: r31 in main and foo.  */
> +
> +/* Variant not mips16.  Check that there only 2 sw/sd.  */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "(?n)s\[wd\]\t\\\$.*,.*\\(\\\$sp\\)" 2 { target { ! mips16 } } } } */
> +
> +/* Variant not mips16, Subvariant micromips.  Additionally check there's no
> +   swm.  */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "(?n)swm\t\\\$.*,.*\\(\\\$sp\\)" 0 {target micromips } } } */
> +
> +/* Variant mips16.  The save can save 1 or more registers, check that only 1 is
> +   saved, twice in total.  */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "(?n)save\t\[0-9\]*,\\\$\[^,\]*\$" 2 { target mips16 } } } */
> +
> +/* Check that the first caller-save register is unused.  */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "(\\\$16)" } } */

Sorry to ask, but I think it would be better to split this up into
a compile test and a run test.  The run test shouldn't be skipped at -Os.
It should probably also go somewhere more general than gcc.target/mips.

I've tried to avoid conditional scan-assemblers in gcc.target/mips
whereever possible.  The directory has been set up so that you can force
any subtarget you like, so that (for example) -mips16 output is tested
by every run, not just things like mips-sim/-mips16.

In this case I think that means using NOCOMPRESSION to force the
functions to use the standard ISA encoding and making the scan-assemblers
test only for that.  Since you've already done the work :-), bonus points
for creating two copies, one for micromips (dg-options "-micromips ...")
and one for mips16 (dg-options "-mips16 ...").  That's certainly not a
requirement though.

Thanks,
Richard


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]