This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] color diagnostics markers
- From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:10:32 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] color diagnostics markers
- References: <CAESRpQCG6VX4JTEXLhrV2LDCLENYB7i8ad-3jj=K6FGeuK5+Ug at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130402091449 dot GE20616 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <CAESRpQAiDrn-9T7Zxvs2ZQVT9hE9_X=gnEyDkS7Y4b-vOiz3Cg at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130408132301 dot GO20334 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <20130409132143 dot GV20334 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <CAESRpQB34G1tSBOaN16A82vHxVb-exU-=S8rgniHK6z+yWM2GA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAAiZkiCFx7HxAH42ZwdDYBpmv4+rUvHcnsSSgZ6DqzmmctgOPQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 11 April 2013 03:54, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
> As I stated before, our pursuit of enabling everything new thing by default
> may have made C++ diagnostics more terrifying.
Do you have examples of C++ diagnostics that are more terrifying now
than in, say, GCC 4.2?
Cheers,
Manuel.