This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [cxx-conversion] RFC - Helper types for building GIMPLE

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Lawrence Crowl <crowl at google dot com>, Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:38:28 -0400
Subject: Re: [cxx-conversion] RFC - Helper types for building GIMPLE
References: <20130313215516.GA29289@google.com> <CAAkRFZKvkHnVPQHDggCGh0aGdV8KTs2EJOmUN4rzXOAirsBNtA@mail.gmail.com>

On 2013-03-13 18:19 , Xinliang David Li wrote:

Using 'add' as interface name can be confusing -- new, or new_stmt, or
new_assignment/new_call etc might be better -- but we can delay the
bike shedding later.

Yeah, I remember discussing this offline and I completely forgot to make the change. I'll fix that.

Thanks. Diego.

References:
- [cxx-conversion] RFC - Helper types for building GIMPLE
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [cxx-conversion] RFC - Helper types for building GIMPLE
  - From: Xinliang David Li

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]