This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [testsuite] Remove dg-excess-errors in gcc.dg/inline_[34].c and unroll_[234].c
- From: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
- To: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr (Dominique Dhumieres)
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, iain at codesourcery dot com, mikestump at comcast dot net, davidxl at google dot com
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:14:15 +0100
- Subject: Re: [testsuite] Remove dg-excess-errors in gcc.dg/inline_[34].c and unroll_[234].c
- References: <20130226103050.C52B93BE1D@mailhost.lps.ens.fr>
dominiq@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) writes:
> The following tests XPASS on i?86-*-linux* and x86_64-*-linux* (see,
> e.g., http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-02/msg02923.html )
>
> XPASS: gcc.dg/inline_3.c (test for excess errors)
> XPASS: gcc.dg/inline_4.c (test for excess errors)
> XPASS: gcc.dg/unroll_2.c (test for excess errors)
> XPASS: gcc.dg/unroll_3.c (test for excess errors)
> XPASS: gcc.dg/unroll_4.c (test for excess errors)
>
> The following patch fixes this to remove the noise. In addition I do not
> see why this tests should be restricted to i?86-*-linux* and
> x86_64-*-linux* (the other tests inline_[12].c and unroll_[15] have no
> restrictions). Tested on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10.
>
> Ok for mainline? If yes, could someone commit the patch since I don't have
> write access?
I've now tested the patch on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and
i686-unknown-linux-gnu where it removes the XPASSes (thus less testsuite
noise), and on {i386-pc,sparc-sun}-solaris2.{9,10,11} where the tests
pass, too.
Unless the release managers object, I plan to commit it later today.
Thanks and sorry for the delay.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University