This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Disable libsanitizer before darwin10
- From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google dot com>
- To: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>, Alexander Potapenko <glider at google dot com>
- Cc: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Dodji Seketeli <dodji at redhat dot com>, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google dot com>, iain at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:17:21 +0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable libsanitizer before darwin10
- References: <20130211155501.GA31314@bromo.med.uc.edu> <6B12A171-A590-408F-A26C-33204E3A91AA@comcast.net>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2013, at 7:55 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
>> Iain Sandoe discovered that on intel darwin9, the asan testsuite suffers hundreds of
>> failures due to the absence of dispatch calls (Grand Central Dispatch) prior to darwin10.
>> The attached patch disables building libsanitizer on darwin8 and darwin9 until upstream
>> decides to support the earlier darwin releases. Bootstrap and regression tested on
>> x86_64-apple-darwin12. Okay for gcc trunk?
>
> Ok.
>
> Committed revision 195958.
>
> If the patch needs to go upstream, could the asan people push it up? Thanks.
>
>
> I like fixing asan so that it works on darwin9. If/when that is done, we can remove this patch; until such time, the patch is necessary.
LLVM uses different build system, so this patch can't be applied
directly. But future integrations won't break gcc.
Alexander, do we want to apply something similar upstream?