This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 01/16/2013 05:31 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Janis, > >> Back in September I submitted a patch to fix five ARM tests in >> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01515.html>. >> You responded in < http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg00972.html> >> and I answered your questions in a reply. > > I believe that Richard's main point was that the skips that you were > adding to the tests meant that they would not be run for valid > command line options. Now I get it. This version is more selective about which multilibs are skipped. I tested it by using multilib test flags for all valid values for -march, with and without -mthumb as appropriate for the arch. The ones that are now skipped are the ones that used to fail with complaints from the compiler. Is this OK? Janis
Attachment:
gcc-20130116-2
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |