This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ PATCH for c++/54325 (wrong error initializing abstract base class)

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 00:02:01 +0100
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH for c++/54325 (wrong error initializing abstract base class)
References: <50C1790B.3040704@redhat.com> <50D44A43.2080500@oracle.com> <50D61845.4060501@redhat.com>

Hi,

Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> ha scritto:

>On 12/21/2012 06:38 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> I was looking a bit more into this Bug, and something seems still
>weird about the testcase in Comment #1 of the audit trail, which we
>also didn't reject with 4.6.x:
>
>What's weird about it?

Well, we still reject it after the patch, whereas we didn't in 4.6.x. Apparently - I didn't check - clang also accepts it. By 'weird' I meant, isn't clear that the Bug is completely resolved...

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ PATCH for c++/54325 (wrong error initializing abstract base class)
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- C++ PATCH for c++/54325 (wrong error initializing abstract base class)
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: C++ PATCH for c++/54325 (wrong error initializing abstract base class)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: C++ PATCH for c++/54325 (wrong error initializing abstract base class)
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]