This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Use explicit -I for libstdc++-v3 header files


On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:40 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Since libsanitizer is used for bootstrap and compiled with raw_cxx,
>>> we need to use explicit -I for libstdc++-v3 header files in
>>> libsanitizer.  Otherwise, we will get
>>>
>>> libtool: compile: unrecognized option `-D_GNU_SOURCE'
>>> libtool: compile: Try `libtool --help' for more information.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes it.  OK to install?
>>
>> Is there a reason why your change to have libsanitizer be bootstrapped
>> wait to be committed until this patch was approved?
>> I think you should revert the change to have libsanitizer be
>> bootstrapped and only commit that after this patch has been approved
>> because right now nobody can do any work as bootstrap is broken.
>>
>
> I posted my patch:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01530.html
>
> Since it didn't fix anything at the time,  there was no incentive
> for anyone to review it.  Please someone review my patch
> and get over with it.

So you broke the build to force someone to review your patch?  That
seems backwards.

Thanks,
Andrew

>
> FWIW,  libjava has the same issue with libstdc++ dependency
> as a bootstrap library.  I applied the same solution to libsanitizer.
>
>
> --
> H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]