This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25]

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:25:35 -0500
Subject: Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25]
References: <20121115215319.AE4ACC0916@torture.tor.corp.google.com> <CAD_=9DT4z=7Vp5g7JYkqzWWFTK5h7mom9Ys98HwGaXoZQhcowQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.02.1211181153470.92389@dair.pair.com> <CAD_=9DTGx56zb3xQ1_=BCeFA98WKuhnssQWUQH7+YuL0arMT9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc2YU2LwMGrzb_6WaPAi_+G6sbQa8WiLau-XPe-=Waw1+Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Richard Biener
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:

> Doesn't that mean that a non-GCC host compiler might fail to build
> 4.8 during stage1?

Yes.  Fixed last week.  vec<> needed to become a pure POD.  So sad.


Diego.

References:
- VEC re-write [patch 01/25]
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25]
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25]
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
- Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25]
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25]
  - From: Richard Biener

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]