Re: sparc bootstrap still broken

[David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>]

From: Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:08:00 -0600

> On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 13:00 +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:19 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> > From: Konstantin Serebryany <konstantin.s.serebryany@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:41:03 +0400
>> >
>> >> Ok. Will this work?
>> >>
>> >> // Are we using 32-bit or 64-bit syscalls?
>> >> // x32 (which defines __x86_64__) has __WORDSIZE == 32
>> >> // but it still needs to use 64-bit syscalls.
>> >> #if defined(__x86_64__) || __WORDSIZE == 64
>> >> # define SANITIZER_LINUX_USES_64BIT_SYSCALLS 1
>> >> #else
>> >> # define SANITIZER_LINUX_USES_64BIT_SYSCALLS 0
>> >> #endif
>> >
>> > Of course, as it matches the test H.J. Liu's patch used.
>> >
>> > Please, at a bare minimum, give him some credit for this fix.
>> 
>> Done: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=168358&view=rev
> 
> I assume we are just waiting for someone to commit this to the GCC src,
> correct?  David (Miller), were you going to do that?  I'd like that
> change committed before I commit our ppc asan changes.

The problem is there are other dependencies in those two commits, the
change doesn't apply cleanly.

This situation is a very serious mess, and a merge burdon like this
really shouldn't fall upon the gcc community at large.