This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25]

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 19:18:38 -0800
Subject: Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25]
References: <CAGWvnykEHDCWmGP=+Vs1HahSqp_pfBt7+mXvYmDtsmA4rAUxDg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD_=9DQVqL-dKGdZoL=mm6Z_6OMKXG4J+TdDHU9xFJx01eiCJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGWvnynkSgGru8jmeUfQqAht32JLusbap5R4rNAhhWSj1AYwhw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:14 PM, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The problem is AIX stdlib.h defines
>
> #define vec_free free

Ouch.

> I am not sure where
>
> #undef vec_free
>
> should be placed.  In vec.h or system.h?

I think system.h.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25]
  - From: David Edelsohn

References:
- Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25]
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25]
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25]
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]