Re: [4/8] Add bit_field_mode_iterator

[Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>]

> Now that we're in C++, I think we should be using iterators that are much
> more in the style of libstdc++.  I agree that the .next interface used here
> is a bit confusing.
> 
> I'd expect to see something like
> 
>   for (bit_field_mode_iterator i(x,y,z); i ; ++i)
>     {
>       enum machine_mode mode = *i;
>       ...
>     }

I pondered on that for half an hour. :-)  But the amount of stuff you need to 
write to make it work in this particular case will make the implementation 
convoluted and bloated for no obvious gains IMO.

-- 
Eric Botcazou