This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Asan/Tsan Unit/Regression testing (was [asan] Emit GIMPLE direclty, small cleanups)
> I migrate a test in the third category. Please help to check whether
> it is ok. Then I will migrate the left. The files added are as follows
> and attached. (Please forgive I use -fasan in asan.exp because I use
> an old repository to try the migration)
>
> gcc/testsuite/lib/asan-dg.exp:
> copy from libmudflap/lib/mfdg.exp, it rewrites the proc
> dg-test, to enable dg-output check in xfail status. Existing
> dg-output check in /usr/share/dejagnu/dg.exp only work in pass status
> but not in xfail status.
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/asan/asan.exp
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/asan/memcmp_test.cc
>
> A problem: llvm provides llvm-symbolizer and asan_symbolize.py to map
> virtual address to its parent func name, which is used in "CHECK:
> {{#0.*memcmp}}" in llvm test below. I don't know whether gcc provides
> similar tools. How to deal with it?
You can not use llvm-symbolizer, but maybe you can use asan_symbolize.py?
asan_symbolize.py is basically a wrapper for addr2line, a libbfd-based tool.
Or is python not allowed in gcc testing infrastructure?
Then you can probably write a simple script in perl that does the same.
>
> memcmp_test.cc in llvm:
>
> 1 // RUN: %clangxx_asan -m64 -O0 %s -o %t %lib && %t 2>&1 |
> %symbolize | FileCheck %s
> 2 // RUN: %clangxx_asan -m64 -O1 %s -o %t %lib && %t 2>&1 |
> %symbolize | FileCheck %s
> 3 // RUN: %clangxx_asan -m64 -O2 %s -o %t %lib && %t 2>&1 |
> %symbolize | FileCheck %s
> 4 // RUN: %clangxx_asan -m64 -O3 %s -o %t %lib && %t 2>&1 |
> %symbolize | FileCheck %s
> 5 // RUN: %clangxx_asan -m32 -O0 %s -o %t %lib && %t 2>&1 |
> %symbolize | FileCheck %s
> 6 // RUN: %clangxx_asan -m32 -O1 %s -o %t %lib && %t 2>&1 |
> %symbolize | FileCheck %s
> 7 // RUN: %clangxx_asan -m32 -O2 %s -o %t %lib && %t 2>&1 |
> %symbolize | FileCheck %s
> 8 // RUN: %clangxx_asan -m32 -O3 %s -o %t %lib && %t 2>&1 |
> %symbolize | FileCheck %s
> 9
> 10 #include <string.h>
> 11 int main(int argc, char **argv) {
> 12 char a1[] = {argc, 2, 3, 4};
> 13 char a2[] = {1, 2*argc, 3, 4};
> 14 int res = memcmp(a1, a2, 4 + argc); // BOOM
> 15 // CHECK: AddressSanitizer stack-buffer-overflow
> 16 // CHECK: {{#0.*memcmp}}
> 17 // CHECK: {{#1.*main}}
> 18 return res;
> 19 }
>
> memcmp_test.cc planed for gcc:
>
> 1 #include <string.h>
> 2 int main(int argc, char **argv) {
> 3 char a1[] = {argc, 2, 3, 4};
> 4 char a2[] = {1, 2*argc, 3, 4};
> 5 int res = memcmp(a1, a2, 4 + argc); // BOOM
> 6 return res;
> 7 }
> 8
> 9 /* { dg-output "AddressSanitizer stack-buffer-overflow.*" } */
> 10 /* { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } } */
Will this run the test in all mode (O0 vs O2 and -m32 vs -m64)?
--kcc
> 11
>
> Thanks,
> Wei.