This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Updating PowerPC's overload vector table
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Michael Meissner <meissner at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "dje dot gcc at gmail dot com" <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:29:24 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Updating PowerPC's overload vector table
- References: <20121019212723.GA11956@ibm-tiger.the-meissners.org>
On Oct 19, 2012, at 2:27 PM, Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> As I beging work on extensions for a potential future machine, I am running
> into the overload table.
I still like the built-in mechanism Kenny and I have.... Not perfect, but vastly better... If you wanted to help submitify it.... I bet we could fine a way to get it to you. Iterators, overloading, over load resolution, in parameters, in/out parameters, ties nicely into RL patterns. .md specification language for them, a generator so one only has a specification; the implementation it generated by the generator. Doesn't yet generate documentation, but that is 20 lines away if I had to guess.