This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [path] PR 54900: store data race in if-conversion pass


On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Clearly we could consider the possibility of a PARALLEL of SET insns,
>> but of course most the compiler won't handle that anyhow.  I suppose
>> that would be a reason to use memory_surely_modified_in_insn_p, but in
>> that case you might as well handle the PARALLEL case now.
>
>
> Done.  Is this what you had in mind?
>
> Tested on x86-64 Linux by looking at the generated assembly for the testcase
> with a dominating write and without.  Bootstrap and regtested as well.

This patch is OK with a ChangeLog entry.

Thanks.

Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]