This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH RFA: Print backtrace on ICE

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:24:18 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH RFA: Print backtrace on ICE
References: <mcrfw6gpo0s.fsf@google.com> <CAFiYyc2HvWZ9-dLrp6JjGwfPSp+rDbnX_1nfi_bP36fpN=u9sg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKOQZ8y-XnnpnAGRbCorsTOYMc+UE2YOdkOqTT6s3PTKu+iaGA@mail.gmail.com> <20120918144023.GA262@x4>

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
<markus@trippelsdorf.de> wrote:
>
> If you use "make install-strip" to install, then libbacktrace will have
> been build in vain. At least for this case a way to disable libbacktrace
> should be available.

Why bother?  The library will fail to find anything useful to print,
and nothing will be printed.

Ian

References:
- PATCH RFA: Print backtrace on ICE
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: PATCH RFA: Print backtrace on ICE
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: PATCH RFA: Print backtrace on ICE
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: PATCH RFA: Print backtrace on ICE
  - From: Markus Trippelsdorf

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]