This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 54594: Type-bound ASSIGNMENTs (elemental + array version) rejected as ambiguous

From: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
To: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 19:08:56 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 54594: Type-bound ASSIGNMENTs (elemental + array version) rejected as ambiguous
References: <CAKwh3qjnJ2kGvqt96GwY7_DB5iE5uvfxk-jX0KP_f3HXDnVPwg@mail.gmail.com>

Janus Weil wrote:

here is an OOP patch for type-bound generics. The problem was that
specifics with polymorphic arguments of different ranks were wrongly
rejected as ambiguous, because 'gfc_compare_types' did not properly
handle CLASS arrays. The patch fixes this is regtests cleanly on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?

OK. Looks rather obvious to me. Thanks for fixing it quickly.

Tobias

2012-09-16 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
	PR fortran/54594
	* interface.c (compare_type_rank): Handle CLASS arrays.
2012-09-16 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
	PR fortran/54594
	* gfortran.dg/typebound_generic_14.f03: New.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 54594: Type-bound ASSIGNMENTs (elemental + array version) rejected as ambiguous
  - From: Janus Weil

References:
- [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 54594: Type-bound ASSIGNMENTs (elemental + array version) rejected as ambiguous
  - From: Janus Weil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]