This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Combine location with block using block_locations
- From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
- To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>, Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Dehao Chen <dehao at google dot com>, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google dot com>, Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, Dodji Seketeli <dodji at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:59:09 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Combine location with block using block_locations
- References: <CAO2gOZV8SP-sOVEJBEsvF+M3yiKwtw7yWarfhZ1xeCVYjE_7KA@mail.gmail.com> <A12F5137-9D4F-4B35-9260-4B3E8278FC5F@comcast.net> <CAFiYyc0UnTUwSX1NtVeNnWiqk7YAQK_zEoPMk7HOXBmpUJQ=Vw@mail.gmail.com>
> I think it's going to make GCC harder to maintain if we drop the -g0
> vs. -g no-code-difference requirement for just some optimization
> levels.
Seconded, this is surely going to open yet another can of worms.
--
Eric Botcazou