This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [middle-end] Add machine_mode to address_cost target hook
- From: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at embecosm dot com>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Oleg Endo <oleg dot endo at t-online dot de>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Georg-Johann Lay <gjl at gcc dot gnu dot org>, law at redhat dot com, nickc at redhat dot com, geoffk at geoffk dot org, richard dot earnshaw at arm dot com, paul at codesourcery dot com, ramana dot radhakrishnan at arm dot com, eager at eagercon dot com, bonzini at gnu dot org, rdsandiford at googlemail dot com
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:22:27 -0400
- Subject: Re: [middle-end] Add machine_mode to address_cost target hook
- References: <1346287598.2407.90.camel@yam-132-YW-E178-FTW> <87hariaz1y.fsf@talisman.home> <1346505654.2200.25.camel@yam-132-YW-E178-FTW> <87wr0c6dst.fsf@talisman.home> <504335BD.7030701@gcc.gnu.org> <1346630332.2200.58.camel@yam-132-YW-E178-FTW> <1346745157.2322.14.camel@yam-132-YW-E178-FTW> <orhard6dbw.fsf@livre.localdomain> <1346785079.2560.24.camel@yam-132-YW-E178-FTW> <CAGWvny=rMLKmEASLXjpVLJXRqWKonqnpPA3BN290i8RvXmc32g@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@t-online.de> wrote:
Hmm .. the ACK status so far is:
Not sure if we are supposed to acknowledge all the straigtforward argument
additions... at any rate, the epiphany hunk is OK.
I think I'll make use of the new functionality eventually, but prefer
to be able to test such a functional change separately, so I'm fine
with the approach to just introduce the infrastructure first.