This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: faster random number engine

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at gmail dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:34:40 -0400
Subject: Re: faster random number engine
References: <CAOPLpQfO0kezyU0oNOf-u1_jzHNfVLJNbGZscUrzdkhAh5FugQ@mail.gmail.com> <503E38A0.5000404@oracle.com>

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wro
> The substance isn't of course. But normally we don't have __gnu_cxx things
> in the same std header. Can't we have a new ext/random and put it in there?
> If we can separate the new code to it, I think people would not even object
> to the target dependency, etc. In ext/ we are quite free to do extension /
> experimental work.

OK, I moved the definition to ext.  Will check in the result.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: faster random number engine
  - From: Benjamin De Kosnik

References:
- faster random number engine
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: faster random number engine
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]