This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR 43852: new configure option --disable-libstdcxx-verbose

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:51:33 +0000
Subject: Re: PR 43852: new configure option --disable-libstdcxx-verbose
References: <CAH6eHdQfwS2nOutZX40emFCz1ekHyKS-w7n4OTBQ3EMXjyvxDQ@mail.gmail.com> <4B9EFBB7-5DF3-4F32-855E-C6B4FE35A04A@comcast.net>

On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Mike Stump wrote:

> So, I was thinking about this a little...  Native compilers usually want 
> the pretty verbose stuff and can usually pay the price.  Cross compilers 
> as a class, are less able to pay the price.  Maybe we want to default 
> based merely on target != host?  I know in my cross compiler, I think 

Certainly not.  The configuration of the compiler for any given target 
should not depend on the host, and existing instances of such things are 
bugs.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- PR 43852: new configure option --disable-libstdcxx-verbose
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: PR 43852: new configure option --disable-libstdcxx-verbose
  - From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]