This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, fortran] [0/5] PR 45586: restrict vs. non-restrict type compatibility hell
- From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr (Dominique Dhumieres)
- To: mikael dot morin at sfr dot fr, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:36:25 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] [0/5] PR 45586: restrict vs. non-restrict type compatibility hell
- References: <20120825180043.C73E73BE1A@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <50392F32.3080907@sfr.fr>
> ... In the meantime is it by any chance better if the first patch in the serie
> is replaced by the attached one?
With the new patch for trans-expr.c (keeping those for
trans-types.c and trans.h), typebound_proc_27.f03 -flto -O
now works, but not class_array_7.f03 nor the other tests
I have tried so far.
Dominique