This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Lawrence Crowl <crowl at google dot com>, dj at redhat dot com, rguenther at suse dot de, tromey at redhat dot com, laurynas dot biveinis at gmail dot com
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:13:42 -0700
- Subject: Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
- References: <20120812200427.GA12561@google.com> <7C104A77-8655-41DE-AF40-B1248B67D2E1@comcast.net> <50372C39.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Aug 24, 2012, at 12:24 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Agreed, patch is preapproved. This is not really done to aid debugging
> though, it is to avoid optimization bugs when compiling stage1.
Ah, but building a non-bootstrap compiler from the top-level builds -O2 and when built from the gcc subtree, builds -O0. Ever wonder why? It isn't to avoid code-gen errors in CC. it is to make the developers life easier. I know, so much of gcc's history is lost to time and at times, not handed down to the new kids. The bad bits, just fade away. The useful things, for example, this, will live on, as some of use still know about and use the feature. When it breaks, we complain.