This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Virtual operands in loop-closed SSA form

From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:57:26 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Virtual operands in loop-closed SSA form
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1208221458550.28649@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <CABu31nP_DB5temgvzZwaeqS47B-=ZuS26c8FsFVrTeaKWGPAmA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1208230934040.28649@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> +       The same applies to virtual operands which are also rewritten into
> +       loop closed SSA form.  Note that virtual operands are always live
> +       until function exit.

Ouch!
What does this do to the memory foot print and compile time for PR54146?

Ciao!
Steven

References:
- [PATCH][RFC] Virtual operands in loop-closed SSA form
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Virtual operands in loop-closed SSA form
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] Virtual operands in loop-closed SSA form
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]