This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: Lawrence Crowl <crowl at google dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, bonzini at gnu dot org, dj at redhat dot com, rguenther at suse dot de, tromey at redhat dot com, laurynas dot biveinis at gmail dot com
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:00:30 -0700
Subject: Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
References: <20120812200427.GA12561@google.com> <502A574B.3000109@google.com> <502AA012.8090200@google.com> <CAMe9rOqc+5+69-3LzrGzCX0C2WcOBO6U049MoOocdu613t5aVw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGqM8fYGp=Pc3cM+2GzLax=LWeYMOfyWW=+cur=PdRU7U7mEQQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Lawrence Crowl <crowl@google.com> wrote:
> On 8/20/12, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The C++ merge caused:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54332
>>
>> GCC memory usage is more than doubled from <= 3GB to >= 10GB.
>> Is this a known issue?
>
> The two memory stat reports show no differences.  Are you sure you
> didn't splice in the wrong report?
>

Those are outputs from -fmem-report.  I am not sure how useful
they are for this bug.

-- 
H.J.

References:
- Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Lawrence Crowl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]