This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (4/6 - hash table rewrite)

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Cc: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, crowl at google dot com
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:17:05 -0700
Subject: Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (4/6 - hash table rewrite)
References: <20120812201408.GA14869@google.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1208151453010.28649@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1208151534410.28649@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1208151547100.2706@wotan.suse.de> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1208151617190.28649@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

On 2012-08-15 07:29, Richard Guenther wrote:
> +   typedef typename Element::Element_t Element_t;

Can we use something less ugly than Element_t?
Such as

  typedef typename Element::T T;

?  Given that this name is scoped anyway...

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (4/6 - hash table rewrite)
  - From: Lawrence Crowl

References:
- Merge C++ conversion into trunk (4/6 - hash table rewrite)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (4/6 - hash table rewrite)
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (4/6 - hash table rewrite)
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (4/6 - hash table rewrite)
  - From: Michael Matz
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (4/6 - hash table rewrite)
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]