This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Lawrence Crowl <crowl at google dot com>, bonzini at gnu dot org, dj at redhat dot com, tromey at redhat dot com, laurynas dot biveinis at gmail dot com, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:23:37 -0400
Subject: Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
References: <20120812200427.GA12561@google.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1208151357110.28649@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <502B93BF.6020802@google.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1208151417450.28649@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

On 12-08-15 08:18 , Richard Guenther wrote:

0 is fixed if you have recent enough gdb.

(gdb) call debug_tree (0)

as 0 is a null pointer constant.

Oh, cool. Progress.

GDB folks, would it be hard to figure out that there is a single variant of the called function and trust the user that they are passing the right pointer value?

Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Merge C++ conversion into trunk (0/6 - Overview)
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]